Jump to content

Talk:U.S. Army universal camouflage trials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. Army trial patterns of what?

[edit]

"U.S. Army trial patterns" is not descriptive enough. What was the official title of the trials program? When did it take place and what was its objective? There have been lots of army trials over the entire history of the U.S. Army - which one is this article referring to? If it was a trial for a new uniform, or simply a new camouflage pattern, then this needs to be clarified at the outset. Dom Damian (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MultiCam

[edit]

This article seems to have a major inaccuracy. MultiCam was not one of the trial patterns. Crye had developed the original "Scorpion" pattern with Natick and submitted that for the trial, and when it wasn't selected (as is already covered), they modified it slightly to create the MultiCam that they released to the civilian market. The original Scorpion and MultiCam are very similar, and pretty much compatible, but they are not exactly the same, and this article shouldn't claim it was MultiCam. Especially since Scorpion W2, another slightly altered version of the original pattern, has been adopted as an Army-wide replacement for UCP; W2 was developed by Natick using their rights to the original pattern, just as Crye's MultiCam made changes to the pattern to secure exclusive rights to that exact pattern. See the Scorpion W2 article for sources. either way, this article needs adjusting. I'll try later. oknazevad (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on U.S. Army universal camouflage trials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on U.S. Army universal camouflage trials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]