Talk:U-Net
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Is reference 10 (Iglovikov & Shvets, 2018) indeed one of the "basic articles on the system", as the text currently claims? If so, what qualifies it as such? Or is it maybe self-promotion by the authors and can be deleted? --37.201.6.182 (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Isn't it just the same source but labelled with different sources?
[edit]I went to read the original (2015) paper as mentioned in the history section of the wikipedia article. I noticed the majority of the wikipedia article is from the 2015 paper just cited with other sources.
I did my school assignment this way of just finding one good source and then finding other relevant sources just to have a more diverse citation without using them, but I mainly stuck with a single source. TheYaoiUnicorn (talk) 13:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)