Talk:Tytherington, Gloucestershire

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why has this been moved to Gloucestershire. This is going to completely cockup people finding the right Kingswood. Bob aka Linuxlad 12:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

31st august 2007

I reverted to remove both links that were added, one inline, and the other in external links. Barely populated commercial directories that are not supported by local government do not satisfy the criteria for inclusion in external links for a place article. aliasd·U·T 23:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. It's a tiny village. I would have thought that a link to the village pub website adds value to the article, and the other website, although fairly small at the moment, is populated mainly with details of church services and local events. I'd describe it as a (or rather, the) community website rather than a commercial directory. --Southglos 23:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Following a brief exchange at Here I have addded tags and propose the contents of Itchington is incorporated in this artitlce. Apart from being the nearest village Tytherington is also the name of the civil parish within which Itchington lies. Though Itchington is said in the article to be a village, in terms of definitions of a settlement it is clerly no more than a very small hamlet.Tmol42 (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to see it merged. It is a small hamlet, and really doesn't have any particularly interesting features or buildings that justify a separate article. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with merging. Guidelines at WP:UKVILLAGES indicate that a parish is an appropriate article to handle tiny settlements which do not have any notable features to write about. Periglio (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also agree with merging, as per the above points. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is so small as hamlets go - a quick aerial count seems to show about 14 houses, and what looks like farms. Importance is another matter. It has it's own (though short) historical gazetteer entry. It is mentioned as a separate entry in Domesday. It is the site of a DMV. This might not be enough (I think it is) but it can be added wherever this place ends up. Acabashi (talk) 22:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider 14 houses a small hamlet. In any case most importantly to be a separate article it needs to meet WP:NOTABILITY. This proposal having had an airing as per the majority view above, I would now like to conclude by merging, any more thoughts before I go ahead? Tmol42 (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]