Talk:Typhoon Tingting/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article is well-written, all the ref links work, and has a sufficient amount of wikilinks. Provide a more exact ref for the information for reference 10, and I'll pass the article. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Cyclonebiskit 22:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- That is better. However, now that we have the proper reference, I can see that reference 10 does not give the 1.14 conversion (at least not in the linked section, which is proper for the previous line.) Which one does? Thegreatdr (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- the source doesn't have it but I do have an email from NOAA which backs this up. I'm not sure how to source this though. Cyclonebiskit 17:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- An e-mail will not be enough. See the maximum sustained wind article for a good reference for this line. Add it, and I'll pass the GA nomination. Thegreatdr (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- I added it and passed the article. Congratulations. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- An e-mail will not be enough. See the maximum sustained wind article for a good reference for this line. Add it, and I'll pass the GA nomination. Thegreatdr (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- the source doesn't have it but I do have an email from NOAA which backs this up. I'm not sure how to source this though. Cyclonebiskit 17:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- That is better. However, now that we have the proper reference, I can see that reference 10 does not give the 1.14 conversion (at least not in the linked section, which is proper for the previous line.) Which one does? Thegreatdr (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)