Talk:Typhoon Kirogi (2000)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi Cyclonebiskit - i will review Kirogi and should have a review up within a couple of hours. Jason Rees (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
"news reports stated that the outer bands of the storm produced heavy rainfall in the Philippines" needs to be changed to "news reports stated that the outer bands of the storm had produced heavy rainfall in the Philippines"

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
On July 1, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) issued a Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert as they anticipated the low to develop into a significant tropical cyclone within 48 hours. - This is a Strange deviation from the Norm.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Im placing the article on hold so that the corrections can be made. Also i would suggest some links to placenames get put in the Japan Impact Section.Jason Rees (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclonebiskits made the changes i asked for so im passing the article. Jason Rees (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]