Talk:Typhoon Ida (1958)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hurricanefan25 (talk · contribs) 16:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'll probably do finish this review by 23:00 UTC, but I might not have the time to do so. There's a bit of info from Longshore, 1998 that I might add to the article. I'm consulting it for this GA review. HurricaneFan25 16:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- And no, TAWX, you don't get to fix these for Hink.
HurricaneFan25 21:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- And no, TAWX, you don't get to fix these for Hink.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- A link to 1958 Pacific typhoon season in the lede wouldn't be harmful.
- On September 22 Ida turned to the north A comma is needed here, right after "22". On September 22, Ida turned to the north
- It became extratropical the next day Link extratropical to extratropical cyclone as not everyone knows what they are.
- No pre-tropical cyclonegenesis in the MH?
- However, over a 14 hour period Use a hyphen, not a non-breaking space. However, over a 14-hour period
- Link UTC the first time you use it, not the second time you use it.
- and at about 0500 "at about" sound strange. Reword it to something like and near 0500
- The winds gradually decreased → Ida's winds gradually decreased
- the Kano River flooding destroyed two villages along the Izu Peninsula Reword to the flooding of the Kano River destroyed to villages along the Izu Peninsula for clarity.
- the landslides and flooding occurred in populated areas Remove this; it's pretty obvious given what you said right before that.
- Publishers in the prose should be italicized. (e.g. A report by Time magazine)
- 520,000 homes were flooded, which is the most on record The most on record for where? The prefecture? Japan? Internationally?
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
