Talk:Typhoon Elsie (1989)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Prose is generally good, except for this: "By October 15, Elise began to take a "stair-stepped" track to the west-northwest and intensified." What does "stair-stepped" mean...?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

One minor issue before I can pass it. Good work! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Corrected the issue, thanks for the review JC. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)