Talk:Typhoon Conson (2004)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 03:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

• What makes http://www.typhoon2000.ph/ a reliable source?
  • Gary Padgett is a reliable source and sends his reports to Typhoon 2000. Cyclonebiskit 03:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • The tracking information comes directly from the PAGASA advisories. Cyclonebiskit 03:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
    • That takes care of that... but... the one below... Ealdgyth - Talk 03:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
• You need to explain "1 minute winds" and the like.
  • Done. Cyclonebiskit 03:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 03:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)