Talk:Typhoon Chataan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very thorough and clear, considering the complexity of the subject. I have one suggestion.

in the lede you mention PAGASA and don't mention it again until the end. A first mention should include Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA). Is there a way you could include this?

Well, the first mentions are in the first sentence. I don't wanna have too much there, but I don't want it to be confusing. Do you have any suggestions? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I was very confused by it. Had to do a find and located it in the lede and then click on the link. Perhaps if you don't mention PAGASA again it would be ok. The first mention at least has a link, so no search and find is necessary. The article is fairly complicated to follow and I found myself hunting back a fair number of times, but none only mentioned in the lede and the last sentence. I won't fail on this account as I don't see this as part of the GA criteria. MathewTownsend (talk) 14:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few changes for the sake of prose that you're free to revert.[1]. Put on hold awaiting response, but that's the only concern I have.
- Thanks, I saw your changes and loved them. :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see that sentence at the bottom of the lede. Don't know how I missed that with "Find"! It's fine. MathewTownsend (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources:

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed:

B. Remains focused:
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!