This article was nominated for deletion on April 21, 2012. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Tyler Summitt is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
With the news about his scandal and resignation, should the page be semi-protected for a short time to prevent a flood of vandalous edits? MichaelXX2 (talk) 01:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject United States High Importance -- is this an error?
I have edited this article from top to bottom and can confirm that any information that should be in this article at this time has been included and it is all properly sourced. As of today, this is a well-written, properly sourced article that meets all of Wikipedia standards. Let's ensure it remains that way! God bless and happy editing. MarydaleEd (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was so proud yesterday as I completed a full edit of this article and brought it to the point that it met all Wikipedia standards. I left this article so well done that, however small, it could be an article by which others could be measured. I have no interest in this subject or this article other than my determination to bring as many Wikipedia articles as I can up to Wikipedia standard. It has been vandalized three times since last night. I encourage editors to make good-faith edits and please contribute to Wikipedia in a positive way. God bless and happy editing. MarydaleEd (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There were a number of grammar errors I fixed for you. I also fixed a claim that wasn't supported by the sources. Since you felt the need to insert your own commentary on the previous edits, I'll insert mine. I'm not sure Wikipedia is well served by bragging about how good your contributions are, specifically when they are full of mistakes. Your friend in Christ, 104.128.171.63 at 22:04 10 April 2021 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.128.171.63 (talk)
Thank you for your contributions and the corrections you made. Exchanging the word "helps" for "works" is correct, not because of what it implies, but because it is the word used by the source. That was a good catch. I fear you misunderstood me or perhaps I should have been more perspicuous in making my point. My intention was not to boast of my edits, but to express how proud I was to bring to completion the collaborative effort of the article, and that at that moment it fully met Wikipedia standards. Of course, Wikipedia articles evolve and people change. I see you corrected a typographical error I made in haste. I don't make grammatical errors, but occasionally I will move so quickly through an article that I leave a typo, so I appreciate you correcting the misplaced comma. I should be more careful. Perhaps you were put off by my comment about vandalism. It is true that vandalism frustrates me because I have so much respect for dedicated Wikipedia editors who spend a lot of time and effort researching and editing. Perhaps my sensitivity caused me to be harsh in my comment, but I will always discourage vandalism. Otherwise, I am always respectful to legitimate Wikipedia editors and give them the benefit of the doubt, even if I find their opinions don't mesh with mine. I've never regretted doing so. Again, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. God bless and happy editing! MarydaleEd (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Missing a comma between two independent clauses is a grammatical error. Your friend in Christ, 104.128.171.63
