Talk:Twydall
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
name
[edit]Suggest we move this form "Twydall, Medway" to "Twydall" as current convention is no need to disambiguate unless there is a) another Twydall anywhere ie "Twydall, Kent", and b) unless there is another Twydall in Kent we don't need "Twydall, Medway". Pickle 04:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. Epbr123 08:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. I have great difficulty in Anything, Medway, as on the ground, it is thought of as Anything, Kent. Medway is just the current name for the Local Authority- it was only chosen as it was marginally better that the working name for the authority Medway Towns Council and the good souls from Gillingham opposed anything with "R" word in it.ClemRutter 12:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Been bold and i gave you all a few days, page moved ;) Pickle 20:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Twydall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.medway.gov.uk/index/leisure/localhistory/timeline/17909.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)