Talk:Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

"Since the SDS molecules are negatively charged, the result of this is that all of the proteins will have approximately the same mass-to-charge ratio as each other. Next, an electric potential is again applied, but at a 90 degree angle from the first field. The proteins will be attracted to the more negative side of the gel proportionally to their mass-to-charge ratio."

If it's negatively charged, wouldn't it be attracted to the positif side instead of the negative one ?

That is exactly my concern as well.

SDS does impart a negative charge to the particle, but is then subsequently attracted to the POSITIVE pole when a charge is applied to the gel.

Also, strictly shouldn't it be size/charge not mass/charge?

The technique was introduced by Klose, 1975; O'Farrell, 1975; Scheele, 1975. Earlier publications did not include a detergent in the second dimension.

What about 2D Blue native page?

This article assumes that the only 1st dimension PAGE technique available is isoelectrofocussing; in my knowledge, there are other valid 1st dimension PAGEs which are commonly used (see: blue native PAGE, for instance). Another technique I read about in various papers (viral protein separation) used a 2D PAGE where the first dimension used a cathionic detergent. This article would greatly benefit from a broader approach.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.totallab.com/products/samespots/support/faq/missing-values.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.totallab.com/products/samespots/overview/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111024123/http://www.ludesi.com/free-tools/geliq/ to http://www.ludesi.com/free-tools/geliq

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Membrane (hydrophobic) proteins in SDS-PAGE gels

2D page methods are reportedly not good for membrane protein separation due to their low tolerance for % of SDS in isoelectric focusing buffers. [1] Could be useful information to include on this page bucas :) (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]