Talk:Twilight (2008 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: White Shadows ^{It's a wonderful life} 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this for a GA as soon as I can. I said that I'll review another one too so I'll try to get them both done at the same time ;)--White Shadows ^{It's a wonderful life} 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
- Prose is fairly good and concise but I'd suggest a minor copy-edit just to make sure that there are not any issues that I may have missed. Once you get a copy-edit, the prose and MOS are good to go.--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I took a pass at copy-editing. What do you think? Cliff smith ^talk 02:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Looks good. I'll consider this part done :)--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 02:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- "It is rated 12A in the United Kingdom and Ireland." needs a source. Other than that, I see nothing else wrong.--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done. ChaosMaster_Chat 02:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No change needed here :)--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- No change needed here.--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
The article is stable now that semi-protection has been put into place. No action required.--White Shadows ^{It's a wonderful life} 17:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':
- All images are ok.--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 21:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:
- Passed'--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have an issue with the images. The one of Edward and Bella just shows them in a meadow. Is a non-free image needed to depict people laying in a meadow? The other image is claimed to be someone's own work but the image is published on several other websites before the user uploaded it to wikipedia. No offense to the uploader but I found the image here here here here plus a few others. --Peppage ^tlk 18:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You make a point. Chaos, can you just remove them so this GA can keep on rolling?--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 23:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the first image (the meadow) is a problem. The second, though, I can easlily just put correct "tags" on them. What should I use though? I'll fix them so there can be no further issues. ChaosMaster_Chat 01:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that last image to pass this GAN. Good job! I'd suggest that you keep that image off of the article until you can confirm that it is in the PD ;)--White Shadows ^{Nobody said it was easy} 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]