Talk:Twenty Negro Law

Why is it listed under a nickname?

Why is this law listed under a nickname? Why isn't it listed as its correct name. As an example of what SHOULD be, Obamacare links to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The same thing should be done here. 24.172.43.163 (talk) 03:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Because if we titled it the "Second Conscription Act," this would raise two problems. First, the article would only be about one portion of that law—the part commonly referred to as the so-called (to contemporaries, as well as historians) "Twenty Negro Law"—rather than the entire act; Second, most historians and students of the war search for (and recognize) this particular subject by this title. Of course the second objection could be dealt with via a simple redirect, but the first would require rewriting and expanding the article. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with the title remaining as it is now, especially since the opening sentence makes it clear that this law is part of a larger act, and gives the full official title of said act. You DO raise a valid objection, however, and I have endeavored to address that within the context of this approach by bolding the official act name, as well. - Ecjmartin (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Twenty Negro Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.americanheritage.com/content/south%E2%80%99s-inner-civil-war-0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)