Talk:Twenty20 Stock Photos
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Embucks (talk) 18:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Why is it considered a copyright infringement if I am citing the sources of the material? Embucks (talk) 18:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Per WP:COPYOTHERS, even though you cited it, this is considered a copyright violation as it is a word for word copy of what is post on the webpage. Since FastCompany is the owner of that content, this is a violation of their copyright. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Embucks (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I will remove the copyright related content and format the page for wikipedia.Embucks (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- If I can suggest, allow this page to be deleted, then work on this in your own draftspace. This can let you create the page, get the sources and format that you need, without publishing it in the main article space right away. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I am no longer using content that would be considered copyright infringement) --Embucks (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- A7 has nothing to do with using copyrighted material, but the article does make a credible claim of notability so I have removed the A7 speedy. My apologies. Meters (talk) 19:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- RickinBaltimore's suggestion is a good one. This article needs lots of work and it would be better to do in out of article space. Meters (talk) 19:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)