Talk:Tuscan Leather
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tuscan Leather article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Tuscan Leather has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 19, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tuscan Leather/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 20:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- General
- Disambiguation links and external links are in good shape!
- I recommend adding in an "External links" section with a MetroLyrics link.
- Done
- Introduction
- I think it would be best to just say that the song charted without being released as a single, since none of the charts listed are particularly great positions.
- Done
- Background
- The liner notes referenced in this section don't imply that Marvin's Room is infamous. You can keep this statement if you find a reference that verifies its notoriety; otherwise, I think it should be removed.
- Done
- Composition
- The reference you provide doesn't seem to include the full Curtis Mayfield speech, unless I'm missing something?
- How would you suggest sourcing from MetroLyrics? The same as any other ref? Giacobbe talk 21:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I recommend changing "he's" for "he is".
- Done
- Controversy
- Looks good!
- Critical reception
- Can you mention in the beginning of the section that the song received favorable reviews? This would be good to know at quick glance.
- Done
- Charts
- I'd like to see the chart positions turned into a brief paragraph in addition to the table; it can be in the beginning of this section or a newly-created "Commercial performance" section, your choice!
- Done
- Credits and personnel
- I would recommend moving this content above the "Charts" section.
- Done
- References
- Buzz Media should be listed as Spin Media.
- PopMatters should not be italicized.
- Done
The article is in good shape, and after my last wave of comments is addressed, I'll be happy to pass the article! WikiRedactor (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Passing, congratulations! WikiRedactor (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments from non-involved users
[edit]- Prism's review
Reference style
[edit]- FN9 has PopMatters italicized where it should not be.
- FN10 should have The A.V. Club italicized.
- FN3, FN12 and FN13 have "curly apostrophes" (‘ instead of ') that need correction.
- Done
Prose
[edit]- Lead
- Could you rephrase the first sentence of the lead to something like "(x) is a song recorded by (y) for his twentieth studio album"?
- "somg" (typo)
- "written by David Foster and Linda Thompson-Jenner, who receive writing credits." (clarify this in a way that readers are able to realize that they received writing credits for "Tuscan Leather")
- "it's" → "its"
- "Tuscan Leather" (in the beginning of the second paragraph) → The song/The track to avoid repetition.
- Done
Just some minor changes that in my eyes will improve the article even further. prism△ 20:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- User:Prism, thank you! --Giacobbe talk 20:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.