Talk:Tuen Mun Progoal FC

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (18)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,475) • Stub-Class articles (6,683)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

Football

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Fair use rationale for Image:Workable FC logo.png

Image:Workable FC logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move for consistency with similar articles. JPG-GR (talk) 18:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Workable F.C. → Workable FC — The dots can be omitted —Hikikomori.hk (talk) 08:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose - They can be omitted but they don't need to be omitted. I see no other reason for a move. 76.167.156.93 (talk) 23:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the dots of the names other Hong Kong football clubs are also omitted. Thus this page needs to be renamed for consistence.Hikikomori.hk (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe you should suggest that the full stops be included in the other Hong Kong football clubs to keep consistency. 76.167.156.93 (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are the dots really so important? I don't think so. In fact, the meanings of FC, AA, SC are already understood. Hence they can be omitted, just like Serbian, Malaysian clubs. Hikikomori.hk (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Equally, is it really so important that the full stops be removed? I don't think so. In fact, the meanings of FF, AA, and SC are still understood. Hence, they don't need to be omitted. Just like in English clubs. 76.167.156.93 (talk) 18:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just want the naming of the clubs in Hong Kong First Division to be consistent. Is it my fault? Hikikomori.hk (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per other articles at Category:Hong Kong football clubs. Moving this one is simpler than moving all others. Songs of ts steiner (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you want a policy-based reason, does Commonwealth English not usually omit the period? Songs of ts steiner (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes, but as for the football clubs, the full stops are retained. 76.167.156.93 (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Suggest a read of Wikipedia:naming conventions and any relevant subpages. Appeal to any relevant policies and guidelines first, fall back on established practice if you think the policy is wrong but the practice is right, and only fall back on personal opinions if both policy and practice seem to be wrong. Andrewa (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Shek Kip Mei/Workable/Tuen Mun Progoal

Actually I think these three are different teams. The later two just borrowed the Shek Kip Mei's membership in Hong Kong First Division League. So I think they should have different articles. It is different from Lanwa Redbull changing its name to Blades.Checkiema (talk)

Agree, I have done the same thing in Chinese version.--Antonytse (talk) 13:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]