Talk:Tudor Parfitt

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Jewish history

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV, article balance

As I found it, this article was POV and unbalanced, concentrating on one book and not even bothering to list his other publications. Any help expanding it appreciated.Doug Weller (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Mr. Parfitt Jewish himself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.115.185.3 (talk) 15:47, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography is a bit of a mess

The bibliography is far too long, dwarfing the article, and is badly formatted. I'd rather not spend time cutting it down and fixing it myself, hopefully someone with less Wikipedia commitments will. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]