This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I want to propose something, because I believe there is likely to be some confusion here. There is an article Trustmark (an insurance benefits company, founded in 1913, but the name "Trustmark" only adopted in 1994). And there is an article Trustmark Bank (a Southeastern banking institution, founded in 1889, and the name Trustmark National Bank formally adopted in 1985). According to Google Trends, it appears more than 3 times more likely that when someone is looking for "Trustmark (Company)", they are looking for the bank, not the benefits organization. So, if either of these two companies "deserves" the root Trustmark article name, it may be the bank. But instead of bickering about which one gets the unadulterated article name, why don't we create a Disambiguation page for the two entities? I will cross-post this at both article Talk pages. If there's no objection after a few days, I will make the Disambiguation page and rename Trustmark as Trustmark (mutual holding company) or Trustmark (benefits company). - AppleBsTime (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
