Talk:Truncated octahedron
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I'm too primitive to get it
[edit]- The truncated octahedron is the only tridimensional primitive parallelohedra.
(I'll correct that to –hedron.) Does tridimensional here mean 'in 3space' or something else? What does primitive mean? —Tamfang (talk) 05:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely means 3-space. I found primary parallelohedron [1]. Tom Ruen (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
suggestion: dotted lines for invisible edges?!
[edit]may I suggest to use dotted lines for the invisible edges in the drawings of the projections? not using them leads to puzzling effects: so e.g. in the column "edge 4-6" ot the table of "orthogonal projections" you think to see pentagons as surface-polygons (in the first row...) thanx! --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Additional information
[edit]compared to similar articles (eg Octahedron) there is some missing basic information about dimensions...
- where side length = a
- Circumsphere (vertex) radius = 0.5 * sqrt(10) * a ~= 1.5811a
- Midsphere (mid-edge) radius = 1.5 * a == 1.5a
- Insphere(1) (square face) radius = sqrt(2) * a ~= 1.4142a
- Insphere(2) (hexagonal face) radius = 0.5 * sqrt(6) * a ~= 1.2247a
- Volume = (1/3) * sqrt(2) * (3a)^3 - sqrt(2) * a^3
also it only requires 6 (not 12) rectangles, of sides [a, 3a] with the short edges along where octagons meet, passing through the center, each corner mapping a vertex.
I'd edit them in, but templates and formatting aren't my forte, so any help is appreciated
74.214.226.120 (talk) 17:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)