Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
Passed. simongraham (talk) 05:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 11:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 17:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems an interesting article and, on a cursory inspection, looks close to meeting the Good Article criteria already. I will start my review shortly. simongraham (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Simongraham Thank you for reviewing this article! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 It is a pleasure. simongraham (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Overall, the standard of the article is high.
  • It is of relatively short length, with 957 words of readable prose.
  • The lead is also short at 141 words. It is currently two short paragraphs. I suggest combining them, which may help mobile readers.
  • Authorship is 15.1% from the nominator and 44.1% from Typhoon2013, with contributions from 31 other editors.
  • Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text to the images for accessibility.
  • It is currently assessed as a C class article.

Assessment

[edit]

The good article criteria:

  1. It is reasonable well written.
    the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
    it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    all inline citations are from reliable sources;
    • All references are online, and are either data from government weather agencies or contemporary news articles. The latter are subject to WP:NEWSORG. The sites seem reliable within the context. For example, WP:RSP notes that The Straits Times "is generally reliable so long as the Singapore government is not involved in its coverage".  Done 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    it contains no original research;
    it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
  3. It is broad in its coverage
    it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
    it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. It has a neutral point of view.
    it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
  5. It is stable.
    it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
    images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

@TheNuggeteer: Thank you for an interesting article. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@simongraham I'm not quite sure what to do here.. I've been assigned to review this page via the new WP:GARC system but hadn't created a review page because I hadn't finished writing one up yet. I didn't consider that the nomination would stay listed unless I created a page. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the coordinator instructions page, it looks like the GARC coordinator is supposed to remove the article from the nominations pool (relevant instructions). Pinging the other coordinators @GMH Melbourne and @PCN02WPS for advice (also @TheNuggeteer who's both the coordinator and the nominator here). ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@F4U I was not aware of the GARC system but am very happy for you to review one of my GAN if that helps. simongraham (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds good to me. Is there any specific article of similar length you'd like me to review? ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@F4U Both Benin Air Force and Ndiadiane Ndiaye are probably about the same length so please feel free to look at either. I look forward to working with you. simongraham (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know what's the problem with ref 17, the source is marked dead and has a proper archive, with a link to the original source. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see "the fourth named storm" in the lead. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Simongraham: Replied to everything. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Replied to your replies. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 Thank you. This is excellent work. simongraham (talk) 03:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@simongraham Responded to the comments. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Simongraham: Hello? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 Hello. simongraham (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Responded to your concerns. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Simongraham: Ping. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 Excellent work. I have done a small number of additional edits to complement yours. I believe that this article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 05:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC) {abot}}[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Talas_(2017)/GA1&oldid=1245637747"