Talk:Tropical Storm Clare

Merge

Why, why does this storm have an article. Look at the figures. It killed no one, the damage is minimal, and it was a tropical storm! There is nothing notable at all for this storm. This storm should be merged, especially given the lack of information of season articles in general. I'll repeat for the 1000th time, what is wrong with adding this new information to the seasonal article? Hurricanehink 22:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this article is not only on a menial storm, it makes no sence. First it says in the infobox that no one died. Then in the impact section, it says ten surfers drowned, then it says two were rescued by police. Any way you say it though, this storm does deserve an article and the info is simply not there, on top of being a very poorly constructed article. Merge it, please. -- §Hurricane E RIC§^Damagesarchive 00:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, merge this article. A minor storm like this one doesn't deserve a seperate arcticle. Just put the extra information in the seasonal article - Yarrah 13:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed error and as far as notability is concerned, this is the only notable storm of the 2005-06 season so far. Storm05 16:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it is the most notable of the season so far doesn't mean it should have an article. Judge the storm, not the season. Hurricanehink 17:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no, I killed it! I'm a murderer! ... RIP Clare. Hurricanehink 17:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh oh! It came back from the dead! Guess you're not a murdered after. Don't worry. My axe finished it off...I hope. -- §Hurricane E RIC§^Damagesarchive 02:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restarted

Ive restared this and made improvements to it. Storm05 13:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged it back in, per consensus. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]