Talk:Tropical Depression Nine (2001)

Tropical Depression Nine (2001) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Merge

Resolved

To be honest, there's not a lot of valuable info here that isn't already in the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season article. The met. history largely comprises of trivial prediction stuff, and, barring impact on land or other claims to notability, I think we should generally avoid having articles on depressions. Thoughts? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I just made a quick Google search and couldn't find any additional information. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, found some, adding it now. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough for me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (2nd time)

Unless you have bad rainfall, if you're a tropical depression, the most you can hope for is a mention in the season article. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Caused no fatalities and damages as stated by the article. (I know this is a precursor disturbance to Hurricane Juliette (2001), but with the merging of a certain tropical depression that led to Hurricane Katrina, it doesn't matter) This article was requested to be merged eleven years earlier for lack of valuable information at the time, but since then time flies and we have seen non-impactful TDs being merged. SMB9 9thx my edits 08:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Much of the info in here is trivial, such as the thing about computer models suggesting two “significant” cyclones and outflow making it “mature”. Damage is unknown, I assume, and no deaths occurred. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Buttons0603 (talk) 21:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Your average TD, barely any damage and a poorly written article. Gex4pls (talk) 02:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Chicdat: I think that's enough, it has been a week. SMB9 9thx my edits 12:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.