Jump to content

Talk:Tropic of Cancer (novel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quality reassessment

[edit]

I think this article has moved passed the Stub Class and should be considered for reassessment. Sure, it's not a featured article, but it's definitely better than stub. Does anyone else agree? QuidProQuo23 16:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just; the references clinch the change. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 18:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance assessment

[edit]

The references cited in the Critical reception section are enough to justify at least an high importance assessment.--Sum (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

rp?

[edit]

is that reference page? The lead looks awkward like that. Enigmamsg 05:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added WikiProject Freedom of speech

[edit]

I've added {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}} to the top of this talk page, due to the article's discussion of censorship attempts throughout its history. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 17:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this addition is also supported by 0x0077BE, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tropic of Cancer (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]