Talk:Tropaeolum/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 02:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Cwmhiraeth! I am keen to review your article. My preliminary comments:
- In the first paragraph of lead, mention it was Linnaeus who described the genus.
- When was the introduction of the first Tropaeolum species?
- 'Stigmas' is a redlink. It is improperly linked, actually - link it to Stigma (botany).
- Convert templates are needed in 'Uses', I think.
- Make it clear what is 'The Plant List'.
Rest everything looks fine to me. Pretty much effort put in! I shall be glad to have it as a GA. Contact me here, or on my talkpage. Cheers!--Sainsf <^>Talk all words 02:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking on this review. I have dealt with all the points you mention above with the exception of the date for the introduction of the first species. I own a copy of the book from which the history section is derived but it does not mention a date. As Linnaeus lived from 1707 to 1778, the date is bound to be in the 18th century so I have used that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the date 18th century would do. No more problems. I think this is much for an article on a genus. Promoted GA! --Sainsf <^>Talk all words 13:24, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the date 18th century would do. No more problems. I think this is much for an article on a genus. Promoted GA! --Sainsf <^>Talk all words 13:24, 21 September 2012 (UTC)