Talk:Trogglodynamite

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability tag

The article is currently [1] tagged with a notability template, dated October 2008 which is when a hit-and-run importance template was posted. [2] There seems to have been no attempt to discuss this by the original poster or by the many subsequent editors of the article, so there's no evidence that anyone has done any investigation at all.

The album is appallingly bad and received the reception it deserved, but is historically significant enough to have been re-released as a CD. It was a key influence on garage rock (some even consider it to belong to that genre). It doesn't satisfy WP:NALBUMS as far as I can see, but that doesn't seem right to me. I'm guessing that others feel the same, which is possibly why the tag and article have both survived without discussion.

The track listing is certainly encyclopedic information. Merging it into The Troggs doesn't seem right, and there is no other suitable article at Category:The Troggs or Category:The Troggs albums.

I think we should just remove the tag, under WP:IAR if necessary. Or alternatively, create a separate discography article. But I'd like to see articles on all Troggs albums in the fullness of time, and this is unlikely to happen while one of the four (only) articles we do have is tagged like this.

Other views? Andrewa (talk) 08:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]