Talk:Tripp Trapp

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

This is not spam. Tripp Trapp is a phenomenon; a chair unchanged since it´s launch in 1972 it is now selling better then ever.

I do not see the difference between this article and for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eames_Lounge_Chair

By the way, Tripp Trapp has presented on the Norwegian version of Wikipedia long before I started in the company (I do not know who put it in there): http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripp_Trapp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjetilaarseth (talk • contribs) — Kjetilaarseth (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

I agree with the above poster: it's okay to have an article on this chair, which is a design classic, at least in Scandinavia, and the article is not spam. Copeh (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the support, and may I add to the "at least in Scandinavia" comment: We are selling this worldwide today our export share is 97% (i.e. only 3% in Norway) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjetilaarseth (talk • contribs) 08:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC) — Kjetilaarseth (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Agreed that it is worth an article. I had removed the deletion tag and started to give a hand as it still needs work.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Regardless of the merits of the article by itself, the creator is apparently Kjetil Aarseth, who is communications manager at Stokke, and so has a conflict of interest editing here. 199.3.224.3 (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The chair is the is the best selling high chair in the world, so it is notable.

Please note, it does not enjoy the same popularity in the English speaking world than in some other European countries, see in comparison how many are listed on ebay as of Jan. 14th 2009

in the USA 16,
in the UK 26
and Germany 285.

The article has citations.

And I think that Kjetil Aarseth kept it quit neutral, but some of the more advert like paragraphs I have changed.

---Lumber Jack- (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality?

I'm not sure there's so much a neutrality problem here as there is un-cited and un-verified information.

Also I don't think it's relevant to talk specifically about why he developed the high chair in the way he did. I'm removing the neutrality flag and putting "unverified research" and "uncyclopedic content" flags on-They're more appropriate to the problem. Nameless9123 (talk) 12:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tripp Trapp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130601003406/http://www.stokke.com:80/no-no/highchair/tripp-trapp-product-concept.aspx to http://www.stokke.com/no-no/highchair/tripp-trapp-product-concept.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]