Talk:Trinity Leeds

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Start‑class Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Trinity Leeds is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Leeds

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds articles

Pictures of sculptures - discuss per WP:BRD - my additions have been reverted, discussion please.

In the "Arts" section I added two illustrations of major artworks in and at the entrance of Trinity Leeds but both have been removed, one with the comment "Picture is not especially illustrative" (it's a picture of The Briggate Minerva, showing her clearly), and the other reverted to the previous general view of the centre (I'd added a closeup of Altus Equus) with "Original picture showed more of centre and was better representatives of the subject matter". I believe both these illustrations are worthwhile additions to the article. Any thoughts from other editors? PamD 18:03, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are BigDaddyBradley (talk) 16:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article contains a lot of future-tense wording (written prior to opening), will of course assist in updating. Also agree with PamD. Xenomm (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all. I worked on the construction of Trinity East and refurb of West, I have many original photographs I took during construction. If they are of interest, let me know here and I'll check back later when i'm at home (and logged in to Wikipedia). I also have some of the Church, taken from roof level from the shopping centre. 135.196.157.83 (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Fezzy Wezzy[reply]

PS - Also have many, many detailed drawings of the place, including many of the original project before it was revised. 135.196.157.83 (talk) 11:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC) FW[reply]