Talk:Trinity College, Perth/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Nasty Housecat (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I think this does not quite meet the GA criteria at this point. The To Do List on the talk page has some excellent suggestions and would be a good place to start. I hope you will continue to expand the article and nominate it again when it is more complete. I have, however, changed the class to C, since it does meet those criteria.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is progressing but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- Most of the references are to school publications. This is okay, so long as the article is not primarily based on them. See WP:RS#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves. Also, some of the alumni links are broken, and all of them should verify that they attended the school. Some do and some don’t. Those that don’t should provide external references.
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- The article needs to be expanded quite a bit. See WP:WPSCH/AG for ideas on what should be included. See especially GA schools articles at WP:GA#Educational institutions, including Aquinas College, Perth, for good examples.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Nice photos and nice use of the gallery.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This is a good start but needs to be expanded quite and have more third-party references before it would meet the GA criteria.
- Pass or Fail:
