Talk:Trinity College, Oxford
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trinity College, Oxford article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Student body
[edit]Perhaps I missed it, but is the student body co-ed, or all-male? 38.115.185.13 (talk) 21:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)LNelsonChicago
- It now reads: The college remained a largely all-male institution until 1979, when... it admitted its first women undergraduates. What does 'largely all-male' mean? Valetude (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Hopkins, Clare (2017). "A very brief history of women at Trinity". Feminae Trinitatis (PDF). Trinity College, Oxford. pp. 6–7. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
Cyril Hinshelwood
[edit]I believe his name should be removed from the list of Former Students as he was an undergraduate at Balliol. However he remains a distinguished entry in the list of Fellows. Hookeslaw (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Trinity College, Oxford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100328151255/http://www.trinity.ox.ac.uk/pages/the-college/chapel.php to http://www.trinity.ox.ac.uk/pages/the-college/chapel.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151124184717/http://163.1.162.121/media/pdf/Trinity_Report_2008_2009.PDF to http://163.1.162.121/media/pdf/Trinity_Report_2008_2009.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Lawn Pavilion Dining Hall
[edit]TTBCamh, I changed the caption of the photo of the college's new dining hall to show that it was temporary, see here, and you have changed it back to current, please can you explain your edit. TSventon (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi TSventon—it's just semantic differences I suppose. I agreed with your reversal of my change for the description of the main hall, which is why I didn't change that back. However, I don't feel that "current" and "temporary" are mutually exclusive. It is the current hall, and as I believe this state of affair is meant to last for over a year—and I also believe Trinity is holding formals in the hall, as well as adding portraits, etc.—it feels like "temporary" doesn't do justice to the work put into it. Hence I feel the description is more than apt. Hope that makes sense. TTBCamh (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I also think I remember why I changed the caption under the picture of the original hall—the current plans are to extensively renovate the hall, which includes a plan to change the decor, paint colour, etc. I think I was trying to get at the differences between the original hall and its new iteration, though I realise that referring to the "former" hall was very poorly worded. TTBCamh (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- The current wording is certainly misleading, as it gives the casual reader the impression that the old hall has been completely superseded. Personally I see nothing wrong with the word "temporary", even if it is expected to be in use for over a year. One way forward would be to say something about the (historic) hall in the body of the article – presumably within the currently very perfunctory and unsourced "Durham Quadrangle" subsection – including a brief mention of the fact that it is currently undergoing renovation. GrindtXX (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- The hall was mentioned until 18 March 2021 "The only major surviving building from the Durham College foundation is the east range of Durham quad, containing the Old Library, which dates from 1421, although elements of the pre-Reformation fabric also survive on the opposite side of the quad, at either end of the 17th-century hall.[citation needed]" TSventon (talk) 18:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)