Talk:Triggermen

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from Triggermen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that critics described the 2002 comedy thriller Triggermen as "neither noticeably comic nor remotely thrilling"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Triggermen.

Wikipedia

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Canadian / German / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. This is an informative insight to the film Triggermen and without this page Wikipedia users would have absolutely no information regarding this film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.249.174 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 17 March 2012

I agree. I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I have to disagree. How is this in any way an "informative insight to the film" when all it contains is a list of the director, producer, and a few cast members? And the statement that "without this page Wikipedia would have absolutely no information regarding this film" is incorrect. They can easily look it up on IMDB or Rotten Tomatoes and find ten times the amount of information on the film there. This film does not pass the notability guideline for films. Rotten tomatoes shows zero critic reviews for the film, it hasn't received any awards, and I doubt it is historically notable. I'm going to have to send it to AfD. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Per improvements while at AFD, the nominator subsequently and decently withdrew his nomination for deletion.[1] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination