Talk:Tricouni Peak

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

"Appearance of a 3-pointed Tricouni boot nail."

This explanation is very suspicious. A Tricouni boot nail is not 3-pointed. Note that "Tricouni" has nothing to do with the number 3. "Tricouni" was the nickname of Félix-Valentin Genecand, who was the inventor of these boot nails (Tricouni being the (real) name of one Italien friend and climber he had in his youth and for whom he had great admiration).Sapphorain (talk) 23:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"BC Geographical Names" contains a sourced short historical version. I have corrected the article accordingly. Sapphorain (talk) 09:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fix is needed for Tricouni Peak -

Should be 50.631667,-123.504444 (From Google Maps).

http://goo.gl/maps/Y90R7

—50.68.71.120 (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Actually, the decimal coordinates you've given above correspond to the incorrect coordinates that were in the article. I have, however, emended the article's coordinates to reflect the actual location of the peak at 50.0139, -123.2445. Thanks for pointing out that the coordinates were erroneous. Deor (talk) 20:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]