Talk:Triart Design Marker
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I feel that this article does not just promote an entity. It provides valuable information pertaining to the build and usage of a tool showcasing it's strengths. Like all other tools a person would want to know exactly what it does to be as informed about it as possible.
Encyclopedia: A comprehensive reference work containing articles on a wide range of subjects or on numerous aspects of a particular field, usually arranged alphabetically.
That is what I feel this article does. It tries to provide a detailed reference to a subject, in this case a brand of marker.
If the external links for stores that provide more information about the marker is the problem, I will remove those. If those links are no good, I do not understand the difference with the links provided on the Copic and Prismacolor Wikipages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prismacolor
Please inform me of what is it that is creating the flag so I can better understand and fix the problem. As a fellow artist, I would just like to provide other fellow artists a chance to broaden their knowledge of all the tools and media that are available to them. Wikipedia is a popular AND informative site to do that.
Sincerely,
Creative_Dragon
Creative Dragon (talk) 22:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- My edits to the page should give you some idea of the problem, the tone was not neutral enough. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I see. A few words can make a big difference. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks Beeblebrox. Creative Dragon (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)