Talk:Triangulum Australe/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: StringTheory11 (talk · contribs) 06:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 06:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

great! Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some quick comments:

Check refs 22 and 24 for URL problems or dead links.

Weird. The hotlinks from the article titles of the two respective refs are working fine today....? Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are two refs in the ref section that do not appear to be connected to any footnotes. These should probably be moved into a further reading section or the like.

I just removed them. They are textbooks which are not any more integral to the understanding of the subject mattter at hand. I think they are from an early version with non-inlined refs Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:55, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At a glance, the rest of the article appears to meet GA standards. I'll do a content review later. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you could give it as bi a shove towards FAC as possible! So be as tough as you like. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed review:

Characteristics:
- North should not be capitalized.

typo; fixed now Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- What are the pointers? (I know the answer, but I don't think a random person reading the article would)

Tricky as there is no one place I can link to for that, so have spelt out the stars. Must rectify that somewhere down the track... Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notable features:
- Probably shouldn't say that it is an equilateral triangle, as the illustration at the top contradicts this...

removed Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History:
- All good here!

Other than these few issues, the article appears to be GA-worthy. Short article, but there's not much else to write about the subject. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.