Talk:Triad (sociology)

This page was proposed for deletion by BDD (talk · contribs) on 29 August 2015 with the comment:
Seems to be built entirely on WP:OR. If there's an article to be had here, WP:TNT could clear the way.
It was contested by Rhododendrites (talk · contribs) on 29 August 2015 with the comment:
It starts off by referencing a notable writer's work. I wouldn't object to stubifying, but delete doesn't seem necessary.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships

Untitled

The article I chose is triad. I will cover more of the basics of what a triad is and what it does in societies daily lives. I will add pictures and examples of various triads across the world and how they have either shaped or affected us. Also I will go more in depth of Georg Simmel and his view of triad in Sociology. Posing other questions as to where "triad" is derived from and how it is pronounced. Along with, stating how triad can alter the way we speak and communicate to others surrounding us. I also would like to contribute to not only how Georg Simmel views triads, but how he came to create the idea of a triad. Also further discuss the basis of a dyad and how that correlates to the topic.

1- Georg Simmel and Avant-Garde Sociology: The Birth of Modernity, 1880 to 1920.[1]http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/233595016/BC1A7331F3B446ECPQ/3?accountid=10901 2- Exchange and cohesion in dyads and triads: A test of Simmel's hypothesis.[2]http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/1506432330/D374344D3D4440D0PQ/9?accountid=10901 3-Conceptualizing inter-organizational triads[3]http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/1809590893/AF2122D132544ADEPQ/2?accountid=10901 4-Simmel's Treatise on the Triad (1908)[4]http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/213640507/47015458E4144998PQ/4?accountid=10901 5-Triadic configurations in limited choice sociometric networks: Empirical and theoretical results.[5]http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/docview/621550734/1E5F276914794D0CPQ/3?accountid=10901 Mwydl001 (talk) 14:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mwydl001. Peer reviewers: Asanc382.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Your progress in the article so far is great. You should add a source to where you got the information for the second sentence. Also, the sentence of your example is worded a little confusing and I recommend that you reword it. Also, in the sentence you mention George Simmel you do not complete your thought, I felt as if it was cut off too short. But, otherwise great job.Asanc382 (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback Asanc382 ! I will take your criticism in account and reword the sentences that were confusing. As well as, revising the other errors that were recognized. Mwydl001 (talk) 21:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my general impressions

While not a bad article, there are some points I feel ought to at least be addressed.

The introductory paragraph is a bit of a "data dump" when it should be more of an abstract (summary). I considered leaving the first two sentences for that role and putting a heading on the remainder.

I've broken that paragraph up into sections to illustrate that it's somewhat redundant and circular. As well, there are claims made throughout that do not clearly depend from credible sources.

It was derived in the late 1800s to early 1900s and evolved throughout time to shape group interactions in the present. What was derived? How did it evolve? Who has made these claims? (See also the grammatically inept It goes into discussing how places have taken triads shape.)

Overall, it's almost entirely about George Simmel, and therefore possibly not enough a stand-alone topic to truly deserve article status. Are there plans to extend its reach and give it validity?
Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When W'pedia articles are undertaken as class projects, the result is generally similar to letting my kids have a puppy: after a few weeks, they cease doing any of the maintenance, and the dog is now solely my responsibility. Certainly, it's highly unusual for anyone school-involved (student or instructor) to return after semester end.

Though it's had 1,526 views in 30 days, there's only been two non-bot edits in two years. Most likely, almost all those readers are in Sociology 1-01 classes, and taking the article as if far more authoritative than reality would support.

Considering the widespread nature of the citogenesis problem, the on-going Wikipedia community has a responsibility to ensure these kids are plagiarizing hard fact rather than cribbing each other's empty conjecture. It would be best to roll the entire thing into the Georg Simmel article (a mere 14K in length), after first removing 3K-4K of chaff.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]