Talk:Tremors 2: Aftershocks

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Tremors2.jpg

Image:Tremors2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shrieker Screaming.jpg

Image:Shrieker Screaming.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pre filming section

I wrote "Tremors 2: Aftershocks began production in 1993 when MCA Universal (feature films division) liked the script. The film was originally planed to be filmed in Australia on a 17 million dollars budget. Unfortunately, due to distributional and promotional cost for a theater release, the feature film division lost interest. The film was later given the green light, by the MCA/Universal home video division, for everything but the 17 million dollar budget and Australian location. Finally, after many actors and technical experts lowering their rates, and several major special effects sequences scrapped, the film was made on a 4 million dollar budget and was released straight-to-video with no theater release." I used http://www.stampede-entertainment.com/wrmkllr/intro.html as a reference since Stampede Entertainment created Tremors I would think that they would be reliable on content related to Tremors. I am still rather new to wikipedia and don't understand why this is not a reliable source. If someone could, in detail, explain the issue I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.John Mortimore Message Me 04:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fansites in general aren't considered reliable sources because the information they publish isn't coming from anything officially associated with the production. If they provide information as to where their information is coming from, we may be able to utilize that. DonIago (talk) 04:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation John Mortimore (talk) 15:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your efforts to improve the article!!! DonIago (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.stampede-entertainment.com/wrmkllr/ is not a fansite, it is a fan page made by the studio that created tremors. Made for fans, not by fans. John Mortimore (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do see that now...I'm not really sure whether I got my wires crossed, or missed something, or what-not, but I guess it would be considered a reliable source. That said, depending on what you add make sure to keep Wikipedia's policy regarding WP:TRIVIA in mind. Cheers, and sorry for any misunderstandings we may have had! DonIago (talk) 01:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. You just wont to make Wikipedia as reliable as possible and I respect that. John Mortimore (talk) 03:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]