Talk:Treehouse of Horror XXI/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give the article a proper read through now and add any points below. Miyagawa (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Well I'm sorry about this because you've been waiting since the 14th November for a review and after reading through the article, I can't find a thing to fault in it. So really good job, because I'm happy to for this to be a GA without any changes necessary. Miyagawa (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]