Talk:Treehouse of Horror VI/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Two quick things:

~~You use both "3D" and "3-D" in this article. Please choose one and change the others to reflect it, for continuity sake.~~
- Fixed one "3-D", the other is a quote.

Homer3:

~~"Homer falls into the hole as the universe collapses on itself but Bart ends up back in the house thanks to his safety." I don't understand this. "Thanks to his safety?" Can you reword?~~
- A key word was accidentally cut out of that, it should be "thanks to his safey rope". Fixed.

--Hunter Kahn (talk) 01:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for taking a look. If you don't mind, could you also review Nancy Cartwright? I'm trying to have it to FAC by the end of the month and a GAC review would be immensely helpful. I'd be willing to review an article for you in exchange. Thanks, Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A good article is:

Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
Neutral: Yes.
Stable: Yes.
Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

--Hunter Kahn (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]