Talk:Treaty of Axim

Treaty of Axim was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 12, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
June 19, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 5, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that forces of the Dutch West India Company captured Axim in present-day Ghana and signed a treaty with the local West Africans in 1642 to become the major European power in the Gold Coast region?

Current status: Former good article nominee

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Ghana Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ghana.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

International relations: Law Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / Dutch / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force

GA review

When reading through the article I have identified the following points which I believe need to be adressed before the article is promoted to GA status.

Expand the article to allow it to be more broad in its coverage.
Add more references to verify all points of the article
Find citations for places where ^{[citation needed]} is shown.

I haven't finished looking through the article so i may add more.

If you think I am being unreasonable please tell me. Anonymous101 (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Failed GAN as it has been on hold for a while (several weeks) and the issues have not been addressed. Anonymous101 (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversed changes

Last changes made to the article reversed, as these were making broad historical claims regarding the nature of the state and kingship which were not properly underpinned by references. Reference to Barbot was incomplete and possibly incorrect. Moreover, edits were made by anonymous editor.

Suggestion is to thrash out the issues first in the discussion section of the Axim article, where the same type of changes were made, and only then copy relevant parts to this article Michel Doortmont (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]