Talk:Traveston Crossing Dam

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Traveston Crossing Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Traveston Crossing Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Incorrect volume of water in this article.

This article refers to this dam containing 153,000 cu km of water. This is equivalent to 1/12 th of the state of Queensland being submerged under a km of water. The dam was going to be big but not nearly that big. 203.185.207.95 (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@203.185.207.95: Yes, it would be a lot of water. I found a document that had it as 153,000 ML, which seems more reasonable. It has been updated. Thanks for point out the problem. Kerry (talk) 06:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]