Talk:Traverse Mountains

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Utah Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Mid-importance).

Point of the Mountain?

Why does Point of the Mountain link to this article?? Please add the information to the article, thanks! --Ibn Battuta (talk) 00:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because that's what the locals call it in colloquial conversation. Vidalian Tears (talk) 16:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Might it be better if this article was called "Traverse Mountains (Utah)"? What is considered justification for giving one mountain range "main topic" (non-disambiguated) status over another, in this case "Traverse Mountains (Antarctica)"? (the criteria for cities is much clearer, for example; Paris, France obviously beats Paris, Illinois based on population, etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esetzer (talk • contribs) 01:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mega-landslide

While Brigham Young University researchers have published this interpretation, it is still highly controversial and should not be taken as the only or undisputed interpretation to the geology of the area. 2604:2C00:FF05:15A:A48A:152D:EBBF:EFB6 (talk) 02:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, my advice is find a paper, study, article, whatever, that is also credible, that proposes an alternate interpretation. Incorporate that into this section and re-title it to something like "Geologic interpretations" or similar. Dave (talk) 06:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]