Jump to content

Talk:Traveling carnival

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photos, References and Information

[edit]

added photos, references, and information Shinerunner 14:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article merge

[edit]

In my opinion, Funfair and Traveling carnival should be seperate articles. While they are similar in appearance, the origins and history are different enough to warrant seperate pages. Shinerunner (talk) 12:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose remerge Travelling funfair and Traveling carnival

[edit]

while the tag at the top states "not to be confused with" , there is no content in either article which distinguishes one from the other. I have suggested merging back here because the Travelling funfair is essentially unsourced. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my oppinion, i think the Travelling Carnival and the Funfair should be different articles as they have different features and different historys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayjay125678 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please say more. What are the differences? Ibadibam (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They seem similar to me, aside from one being in the US and one not. --AW (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And to me as well. Given that there is no substantial opposition, I'd say it's time to merge this. Ibadibam (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Without more information about how they're different (the articles don't indicate much difference, and having been to ones in both the US and the UK, I would say the only differences are minor ones of general cultural/regional difference), I don't see any reason why they should be separate articles. Essentially, these are just the British and American terms for the same thing. Any differences could be referenced in the article. AE Logan (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This reads as a consensus to merge; therefore,  Done Klbrain (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Traveling carnival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of external links, number [12] is nothing more than a spam page. Is it okay to kill it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.134.198.32 (talk) 06:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A dead link doesn't invalidate the information that was formerly available at that URL. The guideline on this is WP:DEADREF, with additional information at WP:KDL. I have added a link to an archive of the page with this edit. Ibadibam (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Traveling carnival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly North American Bias

[edit]

I feel this page is overly focused on North American carnivals and largely ignores British and European contributions to their development. It also says very little of modern British funfairs which I feel are certainly noteworthy. I would imagine this came about due to the merging of this page with the funfairs page which was overly British focused. I was wondering therefore if anyone has an opinion on this, or would be willing to help remedy it by adding information about funfairs elsewhere in the world. Levitating Scot (talk) 19:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

 The food section especially couldn't be more American. Tons of North American stuff and no alcohol --2003:D5:3F33:D700:84BA:5CB0:4C47:4915 (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Highly Suspect Etymology of "Mark"

[edit]

"When dishonest carnival game operators found someone who they could entice to keep playing their "rigged" (slang term: "gaffed") game,[14] they would then "mark" the player by patting their back with a hand that had chalk on it. Other game operators would then look for these chalk marks and entice the individual to also play their rigged game.[13]"

This seems very suspect to me, and the citation isn't exactly to a good source. I think it should be deleted unless a better source can be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.85.232 (talk) 21:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Traveling_carnival&oldid=1195024190"