Jump to content

Talk:Trapper Nelson/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: RohG ??· 16:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator:Quadell


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Yes!the lead is good
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Yes!It follows MoS
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Yes!
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Quiet good.
2c. it contains no original research. Not at all.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. yes.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Well Focused and not controversial.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Yes
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. It doesn't have at-least 60 edits from its creation and not more than 30 since 2010
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. Done!

Errors/Comments

[edit]

 Done

 Done

 Done