Talk:Transport phenomena

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemical and Bio Engineering (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles

-It is not only topic of chemical engineering it also topic of material science(or metalurgy) and material engineering! --83.66.228.79 (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- please include Transport Phenomenon by Bird and Lightford in the references. Probably the best text on this the topic. I found a link to the entire ebook here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/4790039/Bird-Stewart-Lightfoot-Transport-Phenomena-2nd-Ed-2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.195.5 (talk) 15:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 February 2020 and 8 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Huiqi w.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merged contents

I merged most of the contents from Transport phenomena and made that a disambiguation page due to possible confusion with a book summary article entitled Transport Phenomena. I also "tightened up" the introduction and copy edited some sections. ----Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there is only one other page with a conflicting name, I don't think a disambig page is necessary (nor recommended; see Wikipedia:Disambiguation). I would guess that this article is the primary topic, in which case a link at the top of this article to the other one would be sufficient. David Hollman (Talk) 20:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have a good point. However, this was done to not only to avoid confusion, but also to give the reader almost direct access to the article he or she is looking for. I mlght think this is the primary topic, but just as likely it is not. The book that has this title is notable in its own right. It was ground breaking in that it is the first textbook about transport phenomena, and it is specifically designed for chemical engineering students. To me the book appears to be more notable than this article. Thanks for your input.------Steve Quinn (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that Steve. I don't see a problem with the book article being primary; we should just put the hatnote there to the secondary (engineering & science) article. But since there are only two articles, having the disambig page just adds an extra click. David Hollman (Talk) 07:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As there were no further comments from anyone else, I have done this.

Done David Hollman (Talk) 20:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion. Article history previously at Transport phenomena has been swapped to Transport phenomena (engineering & physics). - GTBacchus^(talk) 04:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transport phenomena (engineering & physics) → Transport phenomena – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC) Dab is no longer necessary. Pascal Hacutin (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No need for parentheses. Already redirects here anyway. (Note: This might require a histmerge, since current redirect is from a past merger.) Station1 (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move as this is the primary topic. The book should keep the (book) at the end. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.