Jump to content

Talk:Transport in Delhi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit Urgently

[edit]

This page has been crafted childishly and many sections provide false/unreliable informations. Some sections even target other states. Please provide reliable and useful informations, remember to cite sources and provide references. And ensure that you are editing the article as per Wikipedia article guidelines. - Manik (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what qualifies as urgent, but can someone with a better knowledge of permissible links look at the free advertising for an autorickshaw booking company in the auto rickshaw section? Ash (talk) 06:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DTC Taxis ???

[edit]

As far as i know DTC operates no taxis ! --TvKimi (talk) 12:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

!* Very true DTC operates no taxis. I have tried to improve articles further, help expand them with more data. - Manik (talk) 01:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transport Helpline

[edit]

Should we mention the 42400400 number which is the transport helpline started by the Govt. to help the commuters with public transport related issues ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TvKimi (talkcontribs) 08:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


! Of course you can mention all relevant information, and try to provide refrences also. - Manik (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Refrences and Citations

[edit]

Help this article grow, become reliable and gain points on assessment scale by adding refrences and citations. - ℳanikhere since June' 2007 ( talk contributionssign9) 23:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peacock terms

[edit]

Some parts of the article suffers from Peacock terms and some have original research. First line, "Delhi being a large metropolitan city and having far-flung urban extensions..." is not encyclopedic. Wikipedia has a policy to avoid peacock terms. "Having a highly developed road infrastructure...", developed compared to what? who told that it's highly developed? Delhi has not been noted by BBC best transports around the world. Indhira Gandhi National Airport is a busy airport agreed. But who told that it's "one of the busiest airports"? The cited link only states figures.

"Hiring an Auto in Delhi is very tricky, as very few auto-drivers agree to standard meter charges. The typical method is to haggle for an agreeable rate..." Who asked this? The article is not on Wikitravel. It's not a Delhi tour guide. Write it in a formal tone. Write about Auto rickshaws, number of auto rickshaws in Delhi, starting price, price per km of ride. Night charges if any etc.,

Totally, the article is not written in a neutral tone.

See these articles Transport in Hong Kong, Transportation in Greater Tokyo etc., Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 02:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, the article is written in an 'informal sort of tone', we will try to make sure that it adheres to Wikipedia standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TvKimi (talkcontribs) 14:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The article is still a Start Class article... I'm removing the reassessment comment from the Wikiproject India page...Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 05:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surely the article needs attention. Focus should be laid on data and referencing. But still a lot of improvement has been there since last one one month. I will be focussing on peacock terms issue. Working to make it an 'A' class article. - ℳanikhere since June' 2007 ( talk contributions ) 10:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under the current assessment scheme, this article may narrowly fall in the B-class (but this is debatable). However, User:Mspraveen would probably still be right to assess it as a start-class article under a future-assessment scheme (when it is ready and can be implemented). Let me emphasize: it will take a lot more time and effort to improve this article to achieve any higher grade than a B. As this article still could do with some improvement even before it becomes a B-grade article, I, as the main member of the assessment team, agree that this article is still a start-class article for now. I wish you all the best in improving this article. Ncmvocalist (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 03:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Images789.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Images789.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Transport in Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Transport in Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Transport in Delhi/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
The article is very broad in its scope. Every possible perspective should be considered while building/developing this article further on. Detail on the history of transport in Delhi, say during the Mughal/British era will help. Sections such as associated present/future projects, controversies with the transport policies. Maybe, the Blueline buses issue can be expanded a little bit. Were there any pollution surveys conducted? Referencing is a must and should be omnipresent in the article. Citing reliable sources will definitely help the article. Essentially, good all-around development of the article will warrant further promotion on the quality scale. Maybe the article on the Transportation in New York City should give you enough hints to implement. I hope you find my comments useful for further improvement. If you need further assistance, you may contact the assessment team. With best regards, Mspraveen (talk) 16:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Transport in Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]