Talk:Transport 21

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I think that some maps would be relevant. Maybe one of the upgraded road network, one of the new rail network and one of the Greater Dublin Area showing the metro, extended DART, Luas and motorways/dual carriageways. Jvlm.123 15:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tidied up quite a bit. Didn't have time to find maps, though. There was a lot of duplication of Metro North route details between this and the Metro North article so I've added a link instead. There is still some tidying to be done. Ecozeppelin 11:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Theres Transport 21 signs on the side of the new AX-series Dublin Bus vehicles; yet this article doesn't mention buses at all... Are they actually covered by T21 or did they just want a sticker to replace the NDP one? --Kiand 12:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged: future product

I have tagged as future product as until major contracts are signed and implemented their is no telling how far the project will progress. Perhaps a section entitled "current status" would be approporiate? Djegan 15:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Buses should be mentioned in the article as there are some (although very limited plans to increse busses) Ken 22:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unferenced

I have adding {{unreferenced}} and fact to many parts of this article , in 1 week from now i will removed anything that isnt cited. (Gnevin 13:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Only Rail Elements of the plan are covered...

Trans5999 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)There need to be sections added dealing with roads, buses and air travel as well as naval travel if applicable.[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Gnevin (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Transport 21. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]