Talk:Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CodexJustin (talk · contribs) 15:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review may take a few days to complete. Indicate when you are ready to start. At present, there is a template request in the Effects section which needs attention, and the plot section seems a little long, possibly start to shorten. Let me know when you are ready to continue. CodexJustin (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SlashFox14 and Darkwarriorblake: This article was nominated by an IP editor who has not been picking up on this review. Both of you are listed as the only editors in the top twenty editors for this article who have edited it in the last year or two. If either of you would like to pick up the edits for this assessment, I can then move forward. Or leave some comment; with no nominating editor this review cannot move forward in a practical way. CodexJustin (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if SlashFox14 wants to do it but I don't think it deserves to be a GA, and the film itself should be why we should claim the Infinity Stones and snap Revenge of the Fallen out of existence, so it's not an article I'm interested in promoting, sorry CodexJustin. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 15:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing: Confirming Darkwarriorblake above that this article is not being supported for nomination by any of the top twenty editors listed. The article appears to have been nominated by an IP editor who has not checked with any of the previous top editors of this page as to its suitability for nomination. The film was very poorly received by critics and the article appears unready for nomination; this review is now quick closed. Any future nomination of this article for peer review should first confirm that the article is ready for nomination by contacting at least 1-2 of the top editors listed for this article. Do not renominate unless 1-2 top editors for this article are in agreement for the nomination. CodexJustin (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]