Talk:Transcend Information/Archives/2014

Page disappeared

There was something here; google saw it—but there's no page history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.26.175 (talk) 11:36, 2 November 2003‎

This is no more than a Yellow Pages entry, with spam links. Corporations need to be given some history and social context to be encyclopedic. --Wetman 06:49, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Game

make page for transcend (game) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedcm (talk • contribs) 03:10, 15 February 2006

Fair use rationale for Image:TSLOGO.jpg

Image:TSLOGO.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Products

Should we write about their products like JetFlash, JetRAM, StoreJet, and Tsonic? --Rsrikanth05 15:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Google Finance for transcend

http://finance.google.com/finance?q=TPE%3A2451 Here is the link, should this be included in the main article? --Rsrikanth05 07:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Improvement

Can somebody improve the quality of this article and the article's of the T.Sonic series and T.Photo frame, which are currently in my userspace? The links are in the products section. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Products

@ Iced Kola, I do not get it, where the products are being mentioned? Now they are being mentioned in the infobox, because I addd them. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Huh??

I don't get it, everytime I improve this page, some guy reverts it back? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

You're not really improving it when you link it to your userpages, even if they were articles that you saved from deletion. But since they're in the User namespace... --Jw21/PenaltyKillah 17:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I created a list of their products, with a description, some idiot removed the description, Iced Kola, removed the link.

And what is wrong in linking to a userpage? Wikipedia is supposed to provide knowledge. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I knew you'd chicken out and ignore me. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Firstly, please reserve insults aimed at fellow Wikipedians to yourself. No one, I assure you, will tolerate that.

The knowledge on that page within your userspace are the same content that got your short-lived article deleted by the Wikipedia community. Why? It isn't notable. And it's not just me saying that. We people do not have a so-called Apple bias (that would never happen, so long as the definition of encyclopedia is "a comprehensive reference containing articles on a wide range of a particular field, backed by an authoritative source for substantiation.") Even if that is the general consensus, you are entitled to preserve your work within the userspace. However, for an article in the Wikipedia mainspace, where neutrality and notability are the two branches that stabilize its authenticity, no userpages of any kind should be linked to the it. Unlike mainspace articles, a userpage does not require an inspection of authenticity, due to the intentioned nature of personal privacy.

In other words, pages that only involve your sole maintenance do not deserve to be linked to actual encyclopedic articles, regardless of the amount of bias or citations the userpage contains. I hope you now understand the painstaking routine to keep Wikipedia as neutral as possible, while encouraging the involvement of users like us. If you would like to discuss this further, do not hesitate to approach the Wikipedia:Help desk.--Jw21/PenaltyKillah 15:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

So Apple is backed by some Autohorstive junk. I get it.

Wikipedia is not meant for people like me. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

What's Autohorstive? --Jw21/PenaltyKillah^{CANUCKLEHEAD?} 22:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I meant authorative. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)