Talk:Trams in Vienna

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Vienna Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vienna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vienna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ViennaWikipedia:WikiProject ViennaTemplate:WikiProject ViennaVienna articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

USTRAB

In this text is nothing about the UBSTRA. In german is a page about this. --MOE1997 (talk) 11:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as the article does not really say a lot about the rest of the current network, it is no surprise (to me) that it doesn't mention the USTRAB (Untergrundstraßenbahn = underground tramway network). |FDMS 11:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I have been meaning to complete the translation of this article, and will do that soon. I have also previously considered translating de:U-Straßenbahn Wien, but got stuck at the first hurdle, which was trying to figure out what name to give the English Wikipedia article. I have seen both "Ustrab" and "USTRAB" used on English language websites, but I'm not sure how often this expression is used in English, nor which form of it is preferable, nor whether, in any case, it would be better to use something different as the name of the article. Any comments on any of these points?? Bahnfrend (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translation would be great, as I am a native German speaker I could help you doing so if necessary. As a page title I would suggest USTRAB, as it is the abbreviation most commonly used by the Wiener Linien (they obviously do not care a lot about capitalization, as it is an abbreviation it in my eyes makes more sense to capitalize everything). Also, de.WP and Commons use USTRAB rather than UStrab. |FDMS 19:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the USTRAB is a important part of Vienna tram system because of U2. Some parts of the U2 start as Ustrab from Station Museumsquatier to Rathaus.--MOE1997 (talk) 19:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for our article Trams in Vienna (ugly title BTW) the still existing USTRAB between Eichenstraße and Hauptbahnhof is probably more important … |FDMS 20:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When we make a new page. We it call the new page "Undergroundtramwaysystem Vienna" instead of USTRAB. It sounds better than USTRAB.--MOE1997 (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To me (a native English speaker who also speaks German), that looks a bit too German to be suitable for English Wikipedia. Another option might be "Vienna sub-tarmac tramway", as used on this English language page; I think that's a pretty good translation of "Unterpflaster-Straßenbahn Wien", the full-length version of "Ustrab". Incidentally, Trams in Vienna is a standard form name for articles of this type, eg Trams in Lisbon, Trams in Melbourne, and I think it's okay. Bahnfrend (talk) 14:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use the abbreviation? We also have Vienna U-Bahn instead of Vienna Underground railway or any other English translation. I wouldn't suggest renaming the article, but only because most other tramway articles use Trams in [...], which I would rather use for articles about tramway rolling stock. Fortunately, we have Tram transport in [...] as a standard at least at Commons, where I created commons:Category:Tram transport in Vienna a few months ago (which we unfortunately cannot link to from this article). |FDMS 15:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I mean an extra page for Trams in Vienna about USTRAB in English. --Mö1997/MOE1997 (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We all do :) ! |16:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)FDMS

Okay--Mö1997/MOE1997 (talk) 16:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trams in Vienna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100303021850/http://www.wienerzeitung.at/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=3902&Alias=wzo&cob=475781 to http://www.wienerzeitung.at/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=3902&Alias=Wzo&cob=475781

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]