Talk:Tramlink route 1

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles

Trains: in UK / Streetcars

	Trains Portal
DYK	March 31, 2011

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this redirect to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Tramlink 1 RDT.

This article was nominated for merging with Tramlink on 2021-12-25. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Merge articles and transfer necessary content.

A complete mess - needs a major sort out

This entire article is so very out-of-date as route 1 no longer goes to Wimbledon (hasn't for almost two years now). Everything about Croydon-Wimbledon needs to go into Route 3 - which is currently extremely short. Other stuff is also out of date e.g. Oyster fare. The history, while interesting, seems to be wandering well away from the subject in question.

Basically it needs a complete sort out as do the articles on route 2 (too colloquial), route 3 (the longest, busiest and most important route has virtually nothing about it) and route 4 (highly speculative).

I'll do it one day when I have the time but if someone else wants to make a start ...--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 22:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

two routes

Theres only two routes on the tramlink route map now, one green and one is light green so should route one and two be mereged.[1] Likelife (talk) 12:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the correct naming

The difference between namings is the way the name is said, for example Tramlink routes is the combined naming, whereas Tramlink Route 1 is the actual name of the single route and as a noun, all words should have capital letters. Nathan A RF (talk) 16:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undo deletion - make redirect

As the nominator for deletion, I have found that the other route pages are now redirects to the main Tranlink article - would this be easier? The route itself has marginal claim for inclusion on WP...? IamMattDavies (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]